All Activity

Request: The user should not change the type of the port used for the mesh or the warning must be added. Today I met a user scenario. It was completely inexperienced. There is a Keenetic cable mesh system and there was a change of ISP. The user has chosen the ethernet port (Port 1) that be mesh with the cable as a provider. (Actually, it is enough to change the existing provider (port 0) that only PPPOE information.) After that, problem is occured. He removed it from the interface, but the mesh did not continue as a cable. When Backhaul activated it, mesh continued via wireless. When I looked at the Running-Config, there were outputs that were not in the interface but were configuated. And this was integrated with the Wan (Gigabitethernet1) connection. Sağlayıcı 2 is not visible in the interface. Starting with 10.160.xx.yy IP is for IpoE. (ONT without pppoe) Instead of cleaning the crumbs with the command, I created a provider in the interface again, and I chose the port default. Then I deleted this interface. Mesh was active again via cable. (I removed extender before, so I added it again.) I'm adding the self-test that I have taken to the next message after I follow these steps. I hope it's not wrong and you can catch the situation. @eralde @Le ecureuil

Hello, dear members of the community. How can I set priority of 'Fast Transition' and 'Radio Resource & BSS Transition Management (802.11k/v)' to 2.4 GHz? When using the S24 smartphone, if I move into a room with a poor 5 GHz signal (2 bars, around 20%), the phone does not switch to 2.4 GHz. I enabled debug on WifiMaster0 and WifiMaster1, and judging by the logs, the router does not send a BTM (BSS Transition Management) request to my phone to trigger a switch to 2.4 GHz. Is it possible to prioritize 2.4 GHz for Fast Transition? Thank you in advance.

@fritz box, thank you for checking out the simplified policy configuration. After reading your last comment, I don't think I understand how your network is configured. Can you draw a schematic of your network: - how devices (Keenetic routers, computes, smartphones, ...) connected to each other (including connection policies on Keenetic routers) - on which devices the OpenVPN is configured ? And what problem are you trying to solve with a “double tunnel” VPN configuration?

Hello. Issue is present in double tunnel vpn. If I connect Titan router in cascading and VPN is operative on first router ---> on Titan (2°) new Tunnel not working. But if I switch off VPN on 1 router ----> on Titan VPN tunnel works but very slowly speed (20 Mb Max with 1gb network). So, anyone have same issue on vpn speed (openvpn)? Thx.

I tested...but NO connection.😵

Yes, thank you! This will be fixed in one of the future versions. That is a separate issue (both the KeenDNS name/icon alignment and the spacing in the clients table have the same underlying cause). It also will be fixed

Thank you for your kind reminder. In this context, I wanted to re-upload the relevant screenshots. It seems like the issue occurs on Edge, while everything looks normal on Firefox. Some of the lines are missing. The menus I could identify are 'Registered Clients,' 'IPv6 Route Table,' and 'System Files.' Additionally, with the latest version 4.3.B4, the spacing between client entries has increased. Maybe you could use this space to display clients' IPv6 addresses as well. Sounds like a great idea, doesn’t it? Firefox: Edge: Another issue was that the address field next to the KeenDNS name is not perfectly aligned. For someone like me, who has a thing for symmetry, this is quite annoying!

@ru.celebi thank you for the report! It would be better if you don't hide the posts you publish here. If you don't want to include personal information (e.g. device names / IP addresses / MAC addresses) in your screenshots – blur them out before uploading the images. Firstly, this way you won't post two identical posts, and secondly, if your posts are visible, other users will also be able to check if they have the same problem. Thanks again for reporting the problems

Could you please add btrfs support for usb storage devices?

Device 1811

4.3.B.3 Wi-Fi Mesh Update Scenarios All Gone! Not Work! Update whole mesh, no response, no update which device has update. select device which has an update, no respoanse, no update!

I bought this External HD with RAID support on amazon. https://www.amazon.it/dp/B0DCZB849Y?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title I connected it to the keenetic router's USB. Will there be the possibility of checking the health status of the HD?

Thank you for the self-test file! The configuration looks correct. Can you try something? Will your devices have Internet access if you: - disable multipath in that policy - remove rate-limiting for the OpenVPN interface ? Should look similar to this:

Any news? I upload to you self-test file. Thx.

Release 4.3 Beta 4 (preview): IGMP: fixed multicast forwarding to IPTV ports [NDM-3767] IPsec: fixed adding route to client network on L2TP/IPsec server [NDM-3758] NTCE: fixed "system failed [0xcffd00bd]" error when saving filtering profiles (reported by @dimon27254) [NDM-3770] Web: fixed mandatory password input when creating a user for OPKG and applications (reported by @spatiumstas) [NWI-3700] Web: fixed tooltip behaviour on Mesh Wi-Fi system card [NWI-4062] Wi-Fi: fixed configuration of channel width [NDM-3764] Wi-Fi: fixed connection issues with Intel AC9260/9560 adapters in WPA3 PSK mode [SYS-1325]

Hi, you can do that. If you're having trouble turning on the Wi-Fi backhaul, please contact tech support in your country. Of course, 867 Mbit will be shared between backhaul and wireless devices on the same radio channel, so you will not get that much.

Hello, I have a gigabit connection at home and have two Keenetic devices. A Titan KN1811 and an old Carrier DSL. I've set these up with WiFi Mesh system to Titan is the controller and Carrier extends the wifi. The problem is I want to keep using Carrier for wired connection as well. The current set-up I have is that my TV is connected to Carrier over ethernet and Carrier is connected to Titan with ethernet. In this setup, everything that Carrier touches is 100 mbit max including the wifi. If I remove the ethernet connection between two Keenetic devices, then WiFi is boosted to 867 mbit but the TV connection is dropped. Can I have it so my TV is still connected to Carrier with ethernet, and have my mesh at 867 mbit? So Carrier wifi is still 867 mbit and only ethernet connections on Carrier are 100mbit AND there is no ethernet between two Keenetics. Current: Desired:

I miss to old interface of the Keenetic OS (3.xx). The new interface is very bad and useless. Also why are new Keenetic OS updates coming so slowly ? I remember version 3.xx Keenetic OS updates were released much faster and were more stable with the old interface. I think there are unresolved problems on the developer side with Keenetic OS 4.xx with the new interface. While I have been using my Keenetic brand device without any problems and with pleasure since the first day I bought it, the updates after 4.2 that came with this new interface were a disappointment.

+1. also there is same problem with 4.2.6.3 version.

There is a problem with the grid layout in Edge, but everything looks normal in Firefox.

Hi, In the Install Updates screen, when a large number of components are added, the Confirm button is not visible as it gets pushed down, and the page cannot be scrolled. Please check and resolve this issue. Thanks.

Hello @fritz box Please attach either a couple of screenshots of your browser with Policy Connections/Policy Bindings or a self-test file (you can download it from the Diagnostics page or the System Settings page. If you decide to attach the self-test file, please toggle the "Hide" toggle when adding a new message to this thread, so only the moderators of the forum will see your message.

Hi. I create an OPVN client connection that works (green flag) but all connection go down after I set Policy Connections and Policy Bindings. If I don't set them all traffic go out of tunnel openvpn. I use Keenetic OS 4.2.6.2 How can I resolve this issue? Thanks.

Release 4.2.6.3 (stable): IPsec: fixed L2TP client operation when L2TP/IPsec component is installed [NDM-3759] Wi-Fi: fixed connection issues with Intel AC9260/9560 adapters in WPA3 PSK mode [SYS-1325]

This is expected behavior. The fail-safe mode is designed to prevent the device from losing remote access to the device when its settings are changed. Each of these operations can result in loss of remote access to the device.