PriSonerS61

Hello. There is a small problem I am having. It has appeared recently, I have come across it several times on several different devices. Namely: when the device is away from home, when it is not at home at that moment, it does not fall off the device list. It's been a few hours on average and it's still on the list. When I wake up the wifi of a different device, it falls off the network within a few minutes. The device that is having problems now was dropped from the network in the morning in a few minutes without any problem. So the problem occurs for a random device at a random time. The device moved away from home 2 hours ago, but it is still listed as such in the device list. The "show ip arp" output does not show any beri of the problematic device. I will attach the device information and selftest file in the next secret message.

I support this. I also want to prevent devices with random mac address from connecting to my network. Maybe put a checkbox in the segment settings like "prevent devices with random mac address from connecting". It works like Wireless ACL and when enabled, devices with a random mac address cannot connect to that network/segment. I did some research on the internet and this is how you can tell if the match address is random or not. I don't know how true it is... "If the 2nd character in a mac address is 2, 6, A or E, that mac address is randomly generated."

When navigating to the relevant page, the following error appears in the developer console. @eralde

@eralde 1) When updating from 4.2 alpha 7 to the first alpha 8 the PPPoE password was deleted, we had to add it again. 2) After the update, the "mobility domain id" and "mobility domain key" fields were deleted, I filled them again, but the "mobility domain id" field is not saved. UI problem, the data is in the config. 3) The "wifi mesh system" page is not loaded in the new interface

Reported to keenetic with ticket number #628989

I don't quite understand your first message. Aren't the "Smart Queue Management" and "Application classification and prioritization" features independent of each other? I just wanted an on/off feature for the Smart Queue Management feature because it limits the speed according to the value entered. Maybe the user may want to remove or disable it later. ------- Yes I agree with that, if we are not forced to enter integers in mbps, it will indirectly work the same as kbps.

Hello. I think IntelliQoS is missing a few controls. @eralde These are : 1) Enable / disable 2) MBPS / KBPS selection Feature 1 is needed because : SQM cannot be disabled, there is no control for this in the new interface. When you want to disable it, you cannot enter the value 0 or leave it empty. The 2nd feature is needed for the following reason: Sometimes users may want to fine tune the speed in KBPS. I think it would be good to give this choice to the user. https://ibb.co/mBtd1xD

Hello @eralde. There is a small spelling mistake in the Turkish language. It says "ipv4" where it should say "ipv6". Actually, that is the ipv6 section. There is no problem in English language, there is this problem in Turkish language. Tr : https://ibb.co/F0fscdy En : https://ibb.co/yQ16cNr

Yes exactly, I noticed it in Alpha 15 but I forgot to report it. I thought you didn't report it because it wasn't fixed in Alpha 16, but as usual you did.

Hello @eralde @Anna Zhelankina. There is an error in application names in the new interface. Also there is something called "private-cloud" in the new interface. What is this because there is no such thing in the old interface. https://ibb.co/ssNPCP8 https://ibb.co/cTMS0Vm

Hello. The title is a bit off. The reason is the 26px space on the left side. It will be fixed if the CSS rule is removed. @eralde @Anna Zhelankina Before After

Good news. I'm wondering, is the source of the problem related to the interface or something else ? Does it have anything to do with the old problem and fix I posted above?

Hello @eralde. @Padavan doesn't seem to be active for a long time. Were you able to determine the cause of the problem in the background?

This is another proof that in the data coming to the page via RCI, i.e. in "show mws member", it looks correct, but in the interface it looks wrong. https://ibb.co/vH6CvgK

In the "show mws member" output, "mode": "11ac". It also appears as "AC" in Selftest. If the data is taken from the "show mws member" output, how can it be wrong on the interface when the "show mws member" output has the correct data ? My device is already connected with 5ghz, not 2.4ghz. 5ghz 2x2 80mhz In this case, the data in the "show mws member" output matches the "mode" data on the interface of the extender device, but the data on the controller device does not match. Contrary to what you say, the data on the interface of the controller device should be corrected, not the data on the interface of the extender device. show mws member (controller) controller extender