ru.celebi

Yes. However, this error does not occur when connecting from the local network.

Unpatched problem may persist? Because I use 4.3.A10.1.

The drive size appears normal on my home computer, exactly as it should be. However, on the work computer, it looks like it does in the picture. The file size doesn't matter; the same issue occurs with files of different sizes. I think third-party software is needed for this, as there seem to be no problems with them. However, I’m still curious about the cause of this error; ndm: Core::Scgi::Session: unsupported method "PROPFIND" for "/".

Hello all, I have added a WebDAV drive on Windows, but the drive size appears identical to my system drive, which seems incorrect. When I try to copy a file from the WebDAV drive, I get an error saying, "The file size exceeds the limit allowed." After some attempts to troubleshoot, the WebDAV folder became unresponsive, and my router ended up banning me. Could this be a bug, or am I missing something? The following log entry frequently appears. I researched this error a bit and learned that it might be related to the WebDAV server. ndm: Core::Scgi::Session: unsupported method "PROPFIND" for "/". ndm: Netfilter::Util::Conntrack: flushed 131 IPv4 connections for 212.175.X.X Netfilter::Lockout::Manager: "Http": ban remote host 212.175.X.X for 15 minutes.

If you are using PPPoE, you should disable these settings.

If no custom DNS addresses are entered for the clients, all devices will broadcast with the name set on the router. However, if a different name is desired, the custom DNS address must be set on the individual client. In this scenario, you cannot assign different profiles on a client-by-client basis using the profile set on the router; all devices will use the same profile. However, if you enter the details of a different profile on the client, it will work with that profile.

The cloud-based content filtering and ad blocking component is not installed on my device. I use it as shown in the image. I've never experienced the problem you mentioned.

In version 4.3.A9, the System Settings menu cannot be accessed. Manually navigating to /system via the URL also does not resolve the issue.

Are the suggestions we submit taken into consideration, or is it just a waste of time? If they are evaluated, where are the results published? For example, what happened with my specific request?

I’m not asking for the ability to add or remove components without a reboot. I simply want the system to allow me to choose when to reboot after adding or removing a component, rather than forcing an immediate reboot.

Hello, When adding or removing a component on the router, the system automatically restarts immediately after the process. This can cause interruptions, especially during times when an active internet connection is critical. A more user-friendly solution, similar to modern operating systems like Windows, could be implemented: "Restart Now" or "Restart Later" options: Allow users to manually trigger the restart after completing their tasks. Active hours setting: Schedule automatic restarts during specific time periods (e.g., nighttime). Partial configuration application: Enable configurations that don’t require a restart to take effect immediately. Such a feature would significantly enhance the user experience and help ensure uninterrupted internet connectivity. I hope you consider this suggestion and look forward to seeing if it can be implemented in future updates. Thank you!

This morning, I tried 4.3.A6.1, but the issue persists.

@eralde Is there any progress on this issue? Client devices are unable to obtain an IP address from Buddy6 with A6

Edit: With the A6 update, clients connected to Buddy6 are not receiving IP addresses. We temporarily resolved the issue by downgrading to the A5 version.

After updating to version 4.3 Alpha 6, I noticed the following issues: The Buddy 6 mesh device does not display the settings for the Home segment. The Hero mesh device shows the Home segment settings as locked, which seems to be a bug. Additionally, since our mesh device might be operating in wired mode, it should be possible to adjust the 2.4GHz channel independently from the controller. Greetings from Türkiye, together with @KYTECHNGAMING