ru.celebi

If no custom DNS addresses are entered for the clients, all devices will broadcast with the name set on the router. However, if a different name is desired, the custom DNS address must be set on the individual client. In this scenario, you cannot assign different profiles on a client-by-client basis using the profile set on the router; all devices will use the same profile. However, if you enter the details of a different profile on the client, it will work with that profile.

The cloud-based content filtering and ad blocking component is not installed on my device. I use it as shown in the image. I've never experienced the problem you mentioned.

In version 4.3.A9, the System Settings menu cannot be accessed. Manually navigating to /system via the URL also does not resolve the issue.

Are the suggestions we submit taken into consideration, or is it just a waste of time? If they are evaluated, where are the results published? For example, what happened with my specific request?

I’m not asking for the ability to add or remove components without a reboot. I simply want the system to allow me to choose when to reboot after adding or removing a component, rather than forcing an immediate reboot.

Hello, When adding or removing a component on the router, the system automatically restarts immediately after the process. This can cause interruptions, especially during times when an active internet connection is critical. A more user-friendly solution, similar to modern operating systems like Windows, could be implemented: "Restart Now" or "Restart Later" options: Allow users to manually trigger the restart after completing their tasks. Active hours setting: Schedule automatic restarts during specific time periods (e.g., nighttime). Partial configuration application: Enable configurations that don’t require a restart to take effect immediately. Such a feature would significantly enhance the user experience and help ensure uninterrupted internet connectivity. I hope you consider this suggestion and look forward to seeing if it can be implemented in future updates. Thank you!

This morning, I tried 4.3.A6.1, but the issue persists.

@eralde Is there any progress on this issue? Client devices are unable to obtain an IP address from Buddy6 with A6

Edit: With the A6 update, clients connected to Buddy6 are not receiving IP addresses. We temporarily resolved the issue by downgrading to the A5 version.

After updating to version 4.3 Alpha 6, I noticed the following issues: The Buddy 6 mesh device does not display the settings for the Home segment. The Hero mesh device shows the Home segment settings as locked, which seems to be a bug. Additionally, since our mesh device might be operating in wired mode, it should be possible to adjust the 2.4GHz channel independently from the controller. Greetings from Türkiye, together with @KYTECHNGAMING

Ohh. That's great ^^

Hello. I'm getting a warning or error like the one below with yellow text. Does anyone know what this is? [W] Nov 14 08:16:33 kernel: nf_conntrack: public connections unlocked [W] Nov 14 08:16:40 kernel: nf_conntrack: lockout threshold reached (4294967290), public connections locked for 600 s

I would like to bring to your attention an issue regarding the speed graph displayed on the interface. Currently, the units are incorrectly represented as follows: The graph shows kbit units as Mbit, and Mbit units as Gbit. The following values are also incorrectly labeled: Download: 4.69 Gbit/s Upload: 281 Mbit/s Received: 94.7 TB Sent: 6.61 TB This discrepancy may lead to confusion for users trying to interpret the speed data accurately. I recommend correcting the unit displays to ensure clarity.

I don't need it, it just looks nice Alignments and appearance are always important.

What I mean is that there are differences in the output screens of the two versions. The properly formatted one is v4.1.7, but in v4.2.1, only the QR code, name, and password are displayed. There's no alignment. The 'Keenetic' text and the information message are also missing.

The visual difference between v4.1.7 and v4.2.1 when printing WiFi information is noticeable. I believe the new version is incorrect. for v4.1.7 for v4.2.1

Hello to all. I play an MMORPG game called Silkroad Online. This game has a significant number of players, especially in Turkey and Russia. However, there is a limitation in the game: only two characters can be logged in at the same time per IP address. The only way to bypass this is by connecting to the game through a proxy. However, most proxy servers sold on the market are either banned or datacenter accounts, and these addresses cannot connect to the game. What we need are IP addresses used by home users. In this case, we need to set up a SOCKS5-supported proxy server from home. However, I have no doubt that Keenetic can easily run a simple SOCKS5 server. I'm confident that once the gaming community hears about this feature, more people will purchase Keenetic products. Perhaps it's not a protocol that's widely used anymore, but a feature is still a feature