Jump to content

KYTECHNGAMING

Forum Members
  • Posts

    706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by KYTECHNGAMING

  1. Request: The user should not change the type of the port used for the mesh or the warning must be added.

    image.png.e04e3ee436b7fddc643a7dcbab98717c.pngimage.png.4b00f5d26a177dae43185565b43765fe.png

     

    Today I met a user scenario. It was completely inexperienced.


    There is a Keenetic cable mesh system and there was a change of ISP. The user has chosen the ethernet port (Port 1) that be mesh with the cable as a provider. (Actually, it is enough to change the existing provider (port 0) that only PPPOE information.)

    After that, problem is occured. 

    He removed it from the interface, but the mesh did not continue as a cable. When Backhaul activated it, mesh continued via wireless. 

    When I looked at the Running-Config, there were outputs that were not in the interface but were configuated. And this was integrated with the Wan (Gigabitethernet1) connection. Sağlayıcı 2 is not visible in the interface. Starting with 10.160.xx.yy IP is for IpoE. (ONT without pppoe)

    image.png.2e8a5bcdb83bff1f40c42a6dfff1fff6.pngimage.png.0fa9b1ce9723153c364391762e95dafc.png

    Instead of cleaning the crumbs with the command, I created a provider in the interface again, and I chose the port default. Then I deleted this interface. Mesh was active again via cable. (I removed extender before, so I added it again.)

    image.png.417e12b56ad35a7cfaed4c85d9ae0ba3.png

     

    I'm adding the self-test that I have taken to the next message after I follow these steps. I hope it's not wrong and you can catch the situation.

     

    @eralde @Le ecureuil

    • Thanks 1
  2. 1gbit ile QoS gereksiz bir eylem. Ayrıca 1gbit işleyebilecek işlemci çok daha yüksek güce ihtiyaç duyar. Donanım hızlandırma açık diye düşük çıkmıyor. Aksine 1gbit hat ile hwnat kapatman daha farklı sonuçlar bile doğuracaktır.

    Yeni çıkan tüm Keenetic modellerinde Donanım Hızlandırma (hwnat) varsayılan olarak açıktır. Kapatsılmasını da tavsiye etmiyorum.

     

    https://forum.donanimhaber.com/mesaj/yonlen/160850428

  3. Hello, 
    I saw this problem yesterday. 
    I left the Wi-Fi Mesh system page while adding a node(extender). I can't access the page again when I want to be there. Cleaning cookies, refreshing the page does not work.  Another browser or another device does not reach the page. And Keendns..
    Return to normal after restarting the controller. It is seen that the node is successfully added.

     

    https://prnt.sc/ctc7ew7qSCU1

    https://prnt.sc/QDr1rTBvmZRh

    https://prnt.sc/2ZbRQuBIWdCI

     

    screen record: https://we.tl/t-Z8YMSm6JGj

    @eralde

  4. Hello, 

    The main controller is not updated with the button which is "Update KeeneticOS on all nodes" 
    I also tried my 2 mesh system.

    image.thumb.png.c48b43936c280f31bfffc97db00e9b37.png

    [I] Feb 28 06:59:38 ndm: Mws::Controller::Updater: "50:ff:20:2a:dc:25": checking for an update. 
    [I] Feb 28 06:59:38 ndm: Mws::Controller::MemberList: checking for updates.
    [I] Feb 28 06:59:50 ndm: Mws::Controller::Updater: "50:ff:20:2a:dc:25": pending update, "(auto)" sandbox. 
    [I] Feb 28 06:59:50 ndm: Mws::Controller::Manager: updating members. 
    [I] Feb 28 07:03:38 ndm: Mws::Controller::Updater: "50:ff:20:2a:dc:25": update completed. 

    I could not see that the main controller was added to the update queue in logs and records. I add self-test to the next hidden message.

  5. Users create network with multiple Extenders simultaneously. 

    For example, I set up mesh system via Titan + 4x Voyager Pro Pack + PoE+ Switch 9

    Add some buttons in Wi-Fi system page

    1- check button (selective add) 

    2- acquire all button

     

    As a result super easy made mesh... 

    Thanks. 

    IMG-20250222-152103.jpg

     

    • Upvote 2
  6. 3 hours ago, Le ecureuil said:

    hdparm shows that everything is ok with the cabling and the attained USB protocol.

    Have you tried direct-connected disk to the PC? Which performance it shows?

    Hello, 

    Our Keenetic TR telegram users find the problem which SMB signing force is in latest Windows 24h2 update. Every 24h2 users can face this situation. 

  7. Hdparm test: 

    ~ # hdparm -I /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
    
    ATA device, with non-removable media
            Model Number:       ST4000LM024-2AN17V
            Serial Number:      WCKATJEY
            Firmware Revision:  0001
            Transport:          Serial, ATA8-AST, SATA 1.0a, SATA II Extensions, SATA Rev 2.5, SATA Rev 2.6, SATA Rev 3.0
    Standards:
            Used: unknown (minor revision code 0x006d)
            Supported: 10 9 8 7 6 5
            Likely used: 10
    Configuration:
            Logical         max     current
            cylinders       16383   16383
            heads           16      16
            sectors/track   63      63
            --
            CHS current addressable sectors:    16514064
            LBA    user addressable sectors:   268435455
            LBA48  user addressable sectors:  7814037168
            Logical  Sector size:                   512 bytes
            Physical Sector size:                  4096 bytes
            Logical Sector-0 offset:                  0 bytes
            device size with M = 1024*1024:     3815447 MBytes
            device size with M = 1000*1000:     4000787 MBytes (4000 GB)
            cache/buffer size  = unknown
            Form Factor: 2.5 inch
            Nominal Media Rotation Rate: 5526
    Capabilities:
            LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
            Queue depth: 32
            Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
            R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 1   Current = ?
            Advanced power management level: 128
            Recommended acoustic management value: 208, current value: 208
            DMA: mdma0 mdma1 *mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 udma6
                 Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
            PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
                 Cycle time: no flow control=120ns  IORDY flow control=120ns
    ~ # hdparm -t /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
     Timing buffered disk reads: 430 MB in  3.01 seconds = 142.97 MB/sec
    ~ # hdparm -Tt /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
     Timing cached reads:   1632 MB in  2.00 seconds = 815.68 MB/sec
     Timing buffered disk reads: 424 MB in  3.01 seconds = 140.78 MB/sec
    ~ # hdparm -t --direct /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
     Timing O_DIRECT disk reads: 390 MB in  3.00 seconds = 129.81 MB/sec
    ~ # hdparm -Tt --direct /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
     Timing O_DIRECT cached reads:   582 MB in  2.00 seconds = 290.96 MB/sec
     Timing O_DIRECT disk reads: 426 MB in  3.01 seconds = 141.66 MB/sec
    ~ # hdparm --offset 20 -t /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
     Timing buffered disk reads (offset 20 GB): 416 MB in  3.01 seconds = 138.28 MB/sec
    
    ~ # hdparm --offset 20 -T /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
     Timing cached reads:   1646 MB in  2.00 seconds = 822.39 MB/sec
    
    ~ # hdparm -tv /dev/sda
    
    /dev/sda:
     multcount     =  0 (off)
     readonly      =  0 (off)
     readahead     = 8192 (on)
     geometry      = 486401/255/63, sectors = 7814037167, start = 0
     Timing buffered disk reads: 428 MB in  3.01 seconds = 142.09 MB/sec

     

  8. Hello, 
    Seagate disk is inserted into the KN-3811 usb port. 
    No matter what I do, both wired and wireless copying speeds do not exceed 40mb/s. It's like it's communicating as USB2.0. 
    I tried many things such as Wi-Fi settings, disk formats, different USB cables, but there is no change.

    Could it be a driver problem? Where might the problem be?

    Self-test is hidden in the next message.

    image.jpeg.1a69046c6b07d3ca1bdf94b767fc5ea0.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.4eacaeaf9f5239e609d37a4dfaac38b2.jpeg

    • Upvote 1
  9. On 12/4/2024 at 8:30 PM, Memo said:

    Switch var ama direk de bağlasam aynı yani sade keenetic de 100 Mbit oluyor başka cihazlar hepsi 1000 lik

    Farklı kablo, farklı bağlantı yönü gibi tüm aksiyonları denediysen portların içindeki tırnakları a kontrol et. 

    Gigabit portta 100M görmenin başlıca sebepleri:

    1- Kötü Kablo

    2- Yanlış çakılmış Uç

    3- oksitlenmiş uç

    4- Kılların içinde oynaması / tam basmaması

    5- portların içindeki tellerin yamulmuş olabilmesi

    6- düşük ihtimalle green ethernet 

    7- diğer cihazın 100m porta sahip olması

  10. Yeni abonelikte aile filtresi açık mı bir bak. Yaşadığın durum ya isp bloğu ya da şifre ile bile alakalı olabilir. Rastladığım durumlardan çünkü. Ping-check kapalı tut bir de öyle dene. 

     

    Muhtemelen şu an bir şekilde problemin Keenetic internet varlığı kontrol etmesi bloklanıyor. O sebeple de bağlantı yok diyor. 

     

    Muhtemelen ışığın turuncu yanıyor. Kırmızı yanması sinyal yok anlamına gelir. 

×
×
  • Create New...